No film captures Sixties London as perfectly as BLOW-UP. A new exhibition pays tribute to the hellraising fashion photographers who inspired it, begins Tim Burrows in a weekend supplement feature (above) on the enduring classic....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d46d6/d46d60fe8f12db2534defe095ec7d06a53624df8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7972a/7972aa67223cf0dd3c8f63fad6f3559a9e31a2cc" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4caae/4caae660cdf2c0c8f87e99fb45b50ef7300bd20d" alt=""
Antonioni was fascinated by London's fashion photographers after a significant feature about them in The Sunday Times on David Bailey, Terence Donovan and Brian Duffy who were immortalised in Francis Wyndham's 1964 article. The film became a process of art imitation pop life. Bailey declined to appear in the project, Terence Stamp was lined up to play Thomas the photographer, but lost out after Antonioni saw the relatively unknown David Hemmings in a play at Hampstead Theatre.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7854d/7854df38568d14fdf46c346f6073a03bcd29a0f8" alt=""
There have been several books on the meaning of BLOW-UP over the years and I think I have seen most of them. That recent coffee-table tome is terrific, great photos and essays. I was 21 when I first saw BLOW-UP that great year 1967 - it and The Beatles' SGT PEPPER album defined our cultural landscape that year. The film also highlights the political and social ambiguities that resonated during that '60s boom.
The Vienna gallery says: There is hardly another feature film that has
shown the diverse areas of photography in such a differentiated fashion, and
which attempts to fathom them in such a detailed and timeless manner.
The protagonist believes that he has "documented" a murder; however, the photos turn out to provide only ambivalent evidence, because even enlargements or blow-ups of these photos don't reveal the presumed corpse. This cinematic study of the representation of images and their ambivalence demonstrates that Blow-Up has retained its cultural relevance since its creation in 1966.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/246f7/246f7c1b88bc9f893120adffc27fe88786fff894" alt=""
The protagonist believes that he has "documented" a murder; however, the photos turn out to provide only ambivalent evidence, because even enlargements or blow-ups of these photos don't reveal the presumed corpse. This cinematic study of the representation of images and their ambivalence demonstrates that Blow-Up has retained its cultural relevance since its creation in 1966.
I saw Sarah Miles at that THE SERVANT screening last year, it would have been interesting to have been able to talk to her about BLOW-UP but we already know it was not a happy shoot for her ...
The film still looks marvellous now, London looks fresh and clean, but is it a British, Italian or American film?, seeing as it was created and produced by Italians, shot in England, for MGM ... whatever, it remains an essential '60s classic.
One hilarious BLOW-UP artefact for me is Professor Peter Brunette's commentary on the DVD which is very po-faced as it states the obvious and tells us what we are about to see, and comes across like he is trying to explain the film's milieu to a classroom of American teenagers who know nothing about the Sixties or who these people like Vanessa Redgrave are. Maybe that's what teaching teenagers is like .... ?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/867f4/867f4fa0952c9b961d82493ed4e0a6e04094f16e" alt=""
The film still looks marvellous now, London looks fresh and clean, but is it a British, Italian or American film?, seeing as it was created and produced by Italians, shot in England, for MGM ... whatever, it remains an essential '60s classic.
One hilarious BLOW-UP artefact for me is Professor Peter Brunette's commentary on the DVD which is very po-faced as it states the obvious and tells us what we are about to see, and comes across like he is trying to explain the film's milieu to a classroom of American teenagers who know nothing about the Sixties or who these people like Vanessa Redgrave are. Maybe that's what teaching teenagers is like .... ?
See BLOW-UP label for more on the film, ditto Antonioni, Hemmings, Redgrave, Miles labels