Monday, 11 November 2013

No love for NEW YORK NEW YORK ?

A love story is like a song. It's beautiful while it lasts (as the movie's tagline said).

Our "Sunday Times" ran a new interview with Robert De Niro in their Culture magazine, the usual fawning stuff - as usual De Niro had nothing much to say (like when he was on tv last week on our Graham Norton Show, where he was just there to plug a silly new movie), the magazine interview by Bryan Appleyard name-checked those great Scorsese-De Niro collaborations MEAN STREETS, TAXI DRIVER, RAGING BULL, THE KING OF COMEDY, GOODFELLAS, CAPE FEAR, CASINO - but did not mention their 1977 NEW YORK NEW YORK which seems to be considered something of a flop these days.
I though loved it at the time, and went to its first run and saw it several times and also got the double vinyl gatefold soundtrack album - it was just before the home video explosion when a soundtrack album was the best souvenir available.

An egotistical saxophone player and a young singer meet on V-J Day and embark upon a strained and rocky romance, even as their careers begin a long uphill climb - he becomes a great jazz musician while she becomes a famous vocalist and movie star, can they rekindle their romance?

After the low-budget success of TAXI DRIVER, Scorsese was riding high, and he was given the chance to mount his follow-up on a big scale. Just as the story and situation mimic those of old musicals, NEW YORK NEW YORK's production design aims to recreate those movies' stylized, artificial sets and visuals. I can see it was a troubled (cocaine-fuelled apparantly) shoot which over-ran - the big "Happy Endings" number with Larry Kert (Liza's "Born in a Trunk"?) was removed, but everything about it worked for me. The colour and music, that great long opening sequence when we realise how obnoxious Jimmy Doyle is (for me his jazzman is as good as his Travis Bickle), those scenes of their doomed romance - the artificial trees in that scene in the snow, when he attacks Francine for getting pregnant.  The songs are great too, some in the '40s style of Peggy Lee, and Diahnne Abbot as the Harlem club singer whose  "Honeysuckle Rose" is in  the style of Billie Holiday. The title song by Liza, with that marvellous staging, is the definitive version (sorry, Frank). It and CABARET are Liza's defining moments, and it is certainly a great De Niro performance. It is really a movie buff's musical as Scorsese recreates '40s and '50s musicals - perhaps his A STAR IS BORN ?  Scorsese's opus too was cut from 163 minutes to about 130 for various releases. 
 
Perhaps the bittersweet ending where they both walk away from a proposed meeting did not work for audiences? and De Niro does not play for sympathy as Jimmy Doyle is certainly an abusive husband. 1977 was the era of SATURDAY NIGHT FEVER and STAR WARS and CLOSE ENCOUNTERS, but surely the ANNIE HALL crowd would have embraced NEW YORK, NEW YORK?  Scorsese's later films with Leonardo DiCaprio do not work for me in the same way as his with De Niro. In the interview he says there may be another De Niro-Scorsese film ...

More offbeats soon: FELLINI SATYRICON, Herzog's NOSFERATU, Bunuel's PHANTOM OF LIBERTY, Powell's PEEPING TOM, THE PLACE BEYOND THE PINES, ONLY GOD FORGIVES, Ingrid as HEDDA GABLER, LOVE IS THE DEVIL, that Liberace biopic, more Deneuve and Schneider reviews, and Brush up your Shakespeare: all those HAMLETs, MERCHANT OF VENICE and Orson's OTHELLO ... 

2 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I saw it in it's initial run and while I enjoyed the music, I had a very difficult time warming to the thug that DeNiro played and the doormat that Liza's character allowed herself to be for him. Once I watched it again with the restored Happy Endings number I deeply regretted it's removal from the original and think it could have only helped what was a heavy viewing experience for anyone who had been expecting a tribute to those big splashy musicals of the 40's.

    I thought DeNiro gave a good coiled performance of his character but that character didn't belong in this movie. Those 40's movies leading men could be cads but never the dirtbag Bob played. It didn't help that he and Liza had no chemistry

    ReplyDelete