tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5851593288215620717.post5725809445781930735..comments2024-02-25T03:29:01.043+00:00Comments on Mike's Movie Projector: OscarsMichael O'Sullivanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17820802843771524920noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5851593288215620717.post-42317181800942243782012-03-01T14:49:00.922+00:002012-03-01T14:49:00.922+00:00Its ironic that Meryl got her latest for a film th...Its ironic that Meryl got her latest for a film that polarises viewers but is not very good by any standards .... I would have thought it was much more of a challenge for Williams to take on Marilyn Monroe than for Streep to mimic a near-forgotten British prime minister. <br /><br />Carey Mulligan and Tilda Swinton should also have been on this year's list - but Meryl, George, Brad etc are all over-exposed now so they should have a quiet year or two and leave the field to the newer talent!Michael O'Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17820802843771524920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5851593288215620717.post-16340793501858138182012-03-01T05:54:16.712+00:002012-03-01T05:54:16.712+00:00I agree with all your comments, but Fassbender and...I agree with all your comments, but Fassbender and Gosling should have been under consideration THIS year! It chafes me that Streep now has 3 Oscars and Glenn Close has 0. Its not that I think "Albert Nobbs" actually looks good (neither does "Iron Lady"), but how can that tally be justified?Andy Bnoreply@blogger.com